Skip to content Skip to navigation

Bookseller Speaks Out for Freedom of Hong Kong People

2016年06月17日

On June 16, 2016, Lam Wing-kee, one of the five Causeway Bay booksellers who went missing last fall and later turned up in mainland custody, spoke out publicly and exposed his traumatic eight-month detention by a “Central Special Unit” (中央专案组). During this time, Lam said he was interrogated nearly 30 times without access to a lawyer, and that the televised “confession” he gave on Phoenix Television in February 2016 was coerced and scripted by the authorities.

According to his public statements, Lam was detained when crossing the border into Shenzhen on October 24, 2015, and subsequently blindfolded, handcuffed, and taken to Ningbo, a trip of nearly 14 hours. For five months, Lam was kept in a concrete room under 300 square feet and watched over for 24 hours a day. In April he was transferred to a rented room in Shaoguan, where he stayed until Tuesday, June 14, 2016, when he was finally allowed to return to Hong Kong on the condition that he would return to the mainland with customer records.

Lam’s courageous exposé makes clear this is not a case of local police misconduct. Instead, his ordeal—abduction, illegal detention, and coerced public confession—was the work of the central government, one that has complete contempt for the “one country, two systems policy.” This glaringly highlights the true nature of the central regime.

It is the responsibility of the Hong Kong SAR government and the international community to insure that Lam and other booksellers suffer no further repercussions for exercising their rights to freedom of expression and of the press. In addition, those wrongfully detained are owed an apology and compensation under Chinese law. China’s leaders should get the message—lawless, thug tactics will not succeed to completely silence the truth. There will always be courageous individuals who will speak out and say no to abuse of power.

更多话题

公众知情权 司法公正 行政拘留 任意羁押 公示财产 双边对话
黑监狱 书评 商业与人权 审查 儿童 中国法
中国人民政治协商会议(政协) 公民行动 公民记者 公民参与 民间社会 中国共产党
消费者安全 腐败 反恐 文革 文化之角 时政述评
网络安全 社会民生 民主和政治改革 拆迁 异议人士 经济改革
教育 被迫失踪 环境 少数民族 欧盟-中国 计划生育
农民 结社自由 言论自由 新闻自由 信仰自由 政府问责
政策法规 施政透明 大跃进 Heilongjiang Lawyers’ Detention 历史钩沉 历史/经验
香港 软禁 家庭教会 户口 人权理事会 人权动态
思想争鸣 非法搜查和拘留 煽动颠覆国家政权 信息控制 信息监督 信息技术
信息、通信、技术 公民权利和政治权利国际公约 国际参与 国际人权 国际投资 国际关系
国际贸易 国际窗口 互联网 互联网治理 司法改革 六四
绑架 劳改场 劳工权利 土地、财产、房屋 律师权责 律师
法律制度 法律天地 国内来信 重大事件(环境污染、食品安全、事故等) 毛泽东 微博
全国人大 新公民运动 非政府组织 奥运 网上行动 政府信息公开
人物报道 残疾人 警察暴行 司法评述 政治犯 政治
良心犯 宣传 抗议和请愿 公开呼吁 种族歧视 劳动教养
维权人士 维权 法治 南方街头运动 南方周末 特别专题
国际赔偿 国家秘密 国家安全 颠覆国家政权 监控 台湾
科技 思想/理论 天安门母亲 西藏 酷刑 典型案例
联合国 维吾尔族人 弱势群体 妇女 Xinjiang 青年
青年视野