Skip to content Skip to navigation

Is the Supreme People’s Court the Highest Form of “Government Window Dressing”?

2017年06月23日

Today we went to the entrance of the Supreme People’s Court. The bailiff was blocking the way of an elderly woman petitioner.  But when he saw us, he let us through, and called on his mobile to inform the authorities inside: “They have arrived and are going in.” Wenzu and I exchanged a knowing smile. 

We entered the Supreme People’s Court Hongsicun Reception Office [in the Hongsicun area of Beijing’s Chaoyang District, separate from the Court’s official location] and went to Window number 8. It was the same female judge as the first time, the one who evaluated Wenzu’s aesthetic appeal and refused to tell us her surname no matter what. When Wenzu took a photograph of me, the judge shouted: “Taking pictures is prohibited, there are regulations.” We replied: “Regulations are not above the law; we are exercising our citizens’ right of supervision.” The judge became exasperated, slammed my complaint onto the counter, and turned to her colleagues: “Everybody go inside, let them take pictures!” The judges all pitter-pattered into their back office.

After a while, they came out and wanted to see Li Wenzu’s complaint letter. I said: “I am waiting for you to apologize! You slammed down my complaint letter and identification card. You can’t just walk away when you can’t explain yourself!” The judge turned away again, to another window, and asked for Li Wenzu’s complaint letter. Wenzu handed it over. The judge glanced at it and immediately said: “This matter is Tianjin’s responsibility, we don’t handle it!” She finished speaking and left again! We called after her: “Don’t leave, you take our money as taxpayers, you are supposed to serve us, serve the people, don’t leave! Don’t forget General Secretary Xi’s guidance!”

The judge shot back angrily: “Taxpayers—I am also a taxpayer!”

As she was walking back inside, we heard her saying to her colleagues nonstop: “Wang Qiaoling . . . Li Wenzu . . . Wang Quanzhang’s father . . . . ” She refused to come to our window.

Such is the rhythm of events that is forcing us to head to the Dongjiaominxiang Office of the Supreme People’s Court [the official location of the Supreme People’s Court, separate from the reception office].

709 Family members Li Wenzu and Wang Qiaoling

The morning of June 23, 2017                      

Supreme People’s Court, Hongsicun Reception Office

 

 

更多話題

公眾知​​情權 司法公正 行政拘留 任意羈押 公示財產 雙邊對話
黑監獄 書評 商業與人權 審查 兒童 中國法
翻牆技術 公民行動 公民記者 公民參與 民間社會 中國共產黨
消費者安全 腐敗 反恐 向強權說“不!” 文革 文化之角
時政述評 網絡安全 社會民生 民主和政治改革 拆遷 異議人士
教育 被迫失踪 環境 少數民族 歐盟-中國 計劃生育
農民 結社自由 言論自由 新聞自由 信仰自由 政府問責
政策法規 施政透明 Heilongjiang Lawyers’ Detention 歷史鉤沉 香港 軟禁
戶口 人權理事會 人權動態 思想爭鳴 非法搜查和拘留 煽動顛覆國家政權
信息控制 信息技術 信息、通信、技術 公民權利和政治權利國際公約 國際人權 國際關係
國際窗口 互聯網 互聯網治理 司法改革 六四 綁架
勞改場 勞工權利 土地、財產、房屋 律師權責 律師 法律制度
法律天地 國內來信 重大事件(環境污染、食品安全、事故等) 毛澤東 微博 全國人大
新公民運動 非政府組織 奧運 網上行動 政府信息公開 人物報導
警察暴行 司法評述 政治犯 政治 良心犯 宣傳
抗議和請願 公開呼籲 公共安全 種族歧視 勞動教養 維權人士
維權 法治 特別專題 國家賠償 國家秘密 國家安全
顛覆國家政權 監控 科技 思想/理論 天安門母親 西藏
酷刑 典型案例 聯合國 維吾爾族人 弱勢群體 婦女
青年 青年視野