Skip to content Skip to navigation

While China prevents the UN Commission from fulfilling its mandate, the 7th attempt to present a resolution on China continues to produce significant pressure on the Chinese government

April 15, 1997

Human Rights in China (HRIC) regrets the decision of the UN Commission on Human Rights to adopt a so-called no-action motion, a procedural device misused by China to block a resolution on its human rights record.

In spite of this decision, HRIC believes that the attempt to present this resolution for discussion does highlight the gross and systematic violations of human rights in China and produces a constructive pressure. Throughout the years, this pressure has forced the Chinese government to take into account international standards in certain aspects of its legal reform. It continues to brutally repress all critical voices, in particular by resorting to the new state security laws.

This year, introducing a resolution on the human rights situation in China--at the initiative of Denmark and 14 co-sponsors--did bring the Chinese government closer to ratifying one of the two key international human rights covenants, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. "Persistent pressure has to be maintained both through bilateral and multilateral means in order to make China accountable to the fundamental norms of the international community. It will facilitate the transformation of China into a humane, free society," said Xiao Qiang, the executive director of HRIC.

Explore Topics

Access to Information Access to Justice Administrative Detention Arbitrary Detention Asset Transparency Bilateral Dialogue
Black Jail Book Review Business And Human Rights Censorship Children Chinese Law
Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) Citizen Activism Citizen Journalists Citizen Participation Civil Society Communist Party Of China
Consumer Safety Corruption Counterterrorism Cultural Revolution Culture Matters Current and Political Events
Cyber Security Daily Challenges Democratic And Political Reform Demolition And Relocation  Dissidents Economic Reform
Education Enforced Disappearance Environment Ethnic Minorities EU-China Family Planning
Farmers Freedom of Association Freedom of Expression Freedom of Press Freedom of Religion Government Accountability
Government regulation Government transparency Great Leap Forward Heilongjiang Lawyers’ Detention Historical Anecdotes History/Experience
Hong Kong House Arrest House Church Hukou Human Rights Council Human rights updates
Ideological Contest Illegal Search And Detention Inciting Subversion Of State Power Information Control  Information monitoring Information technology
Information, Communications, Technology (ICT) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) International Engagement  International Human Rights International Investment  International Relations
International Trade International Window Internet Internet Governance Judicial Reform June Fourth
Kidnapping Labor Camps Labor Rights Land, Property, Housing Lawyer's rights Lawyers
Legal System Legal World Letters from the Mainland Major Event (Environment, Food Safety, Accident, etc.) Mao Zedong Microblogs (Weibo)
Migrants Mongolia National People's Congress (NPC) New Citizens Movement Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Olympics
Online Activism Open Government Information Personal Story Persons With Disabilities Police Brutality Political commentary
Political Prisoner Politics Prisoner Of Conscience Propaganda Protests And Petitions Public Appeal
Public Security Racial Discrimination Reeducation-Through-Labor Rights Defenders Rights Defense Rule Of Law
Southern Street Movement Southern Weekly Special Topic State compensation State Secrets State Security
Subversion Of State Power Surveillance Taiwan Technology Thoughts/Theories Tiananmen Mothers
Tibet Torture Typical cases United Nations Uyghurs, Uighurs Vulnerable Groups
Women Xinjiang Youth Youth Perspective