Human Rights in China (HRIC) has received a copy of an application for a trial supervision review filed on behalf of imprisoned dissident writer Shi Tao by his mother, Gao Qinsheng. Supported by a legal brief written by defense attorney Mo Shaoping, Gao is applying on the grounds of “serious procedural defects” in Shi Tao’s appeal hearing.

A freelance writer and former reporter at the daily Dangdai Shangbao (Contemporary Business News), Shi Tao was detained on November 23, 2004, in Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, after providing an overseas Web site with a summary of an official document alerting journalists to possible social instability around the 15th anniversary of the Tiananmen crackdown. He was formally arrested on December 14, 2004 on charges of illegally providing state secrets overseas. On April 30, 2005 the Changsha Municipal Intermediate People’s Court in Hunan Province sentenced Shi Tao to 10 years in prison. His appeal to the Hunan Province High People’s Court on June 2 was unsuccessful. Under China’s trial supervision procedures, a defendant can appeal to a higher court to review a legally effective judgment.

In his legal brief to the Hunan Province High People’s Court, Mo Shaoping enumerates the following defects in Shi Tao’s appeal hearing:

1. The appellate court failed to hear the arguments presented by Shi Tao’s legal defense;


2. The appellate court did not accept testimony from Shi Tao;


3. The appellate court did not offer the defendant the right to appeal provided by law in that it failed to respond to the evidence presented by the defense;


4. The appeal hearing was closed to the public; although the Criminal Procedure Law provides that appeal hearings, even for state secrets cases, should be open to the public unless there are enumerated exceptional circumstances.

Back | Top