Skip to content Skip to navigation

U.N. Commission’s silence on China’s rights record “irresponsible,” says HRIC


The U.N. Commission on Human Rights today shied away from condemning the deteriorating human rights situation in China. The Commission ignored reports, both from its own human rights mechanisms and from independent NGOs, that the Chinese government routinely violates its citizens’ most fundamental rights. HRIC considers the Commission’s decision to refuse even to discuss such serious, systematic rights abuses to be unjustifiable and irresponsible.

“It was the brutal crackdown on the 1989 Democracy Movement that led the Commission to start scrutinizing China’s human rights record. Ten years later, China is experiencing a period of severe repression. Yet the Commission is silent. The world’s highest human rights body has failed to uphold its mandate,” said Xiao Qiang, HRIC’s Executive Director.

The “motion of no action” introduced by China was approved with a majority of 22 votes, with 17 against and 14 abstentions. Tantamount to exercising veto power, this motion is a procedural device that effectively prevented the Commission from discussing on the resolution on China’s human rights situation tabled by the United States. Commission member states were thus prevented from discussing the substance of the resolution and from voting on it. Examining the situation of human rights in all countries in the world is a mandated part of the Commission’s agenda.

Since China has not ratified the two major U.N. human rights treaties—the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights—routine procedures for exercising international scrutiny over the broad range of human rights issues in the PRC are unavailable. Furthermore, the government does not permit the establishment of domestic rights monitoring organizations, and hardly allows any discussion of rights abuses in the media. Thus such international measures as Commission resolutions are crucial in pushing for rights-related changes.

“Eventually, China will have no alternative but to institutionalize protection of human rights. In order to establish human rights norms as the guiding principles of this transition towards a system more in accord with international standards, it is critical to hold China accountable now for its human rights abuses. This is both a moral imperative and a practical necessity. HRIC wishes to thank all the countries who opposed the no action motion. History will judge who voted on the right side,” Xiao Qiang added.


709事件 公众知情权 司法公正 行政拘留 法律天地 任意羁押
公示财产 双边对话 黑监狱 书评 商业与人权 审查
零八宪章 儿童 中国法 翻墙技术 公民行动 公民记者
公民参与 民间社会 评论 中国共产党 宪法 消费者安全
思想争鸣 腐败 反恐 向强权说“不!” 文革 文化之角
时政述评 网络安全 社会民生 民主和政治改革 拆迁 异议人士
教育 选举 被迫失踪 环境 少数民族 欧盟-中国
计划生育 农民 结社自由 言论自由 新闻自由 信仰自由
政府问责 政策法规 施政透明 香港 软禁 中国人权翻译
户口 人权理事会 人权动态 非法搜查和拘留 煽动颠覆国家政权 信息控制
信息技术 信息、通信、技术 公民权利和政治权利国际公约 国际人权 国际窗口 国际关系
互联网 互联网治理 建三江律师维权 司法改革 六四 绑架
劳改场 劳工权利 土地、财产、房屋 律师权责 律师 法律制度
国内来信 重大事件(环境污染、食品安全、事故等) 毛泽东 微博 全国人大 新公民运动
非政府组织 奥运 一国两制 网上行动 政府信息公开 人物
警察暴行 司法评述 政治犯 政治 良心犯 历史钩沉
宣传 抗议和请愿 公开呼吁 公共安全 种族歧视 劳动教养
维权人士 维权 法治 上海合作组织 特别专题 国际赔偿
国家秘密 国家安全 颠覆国家政权 监控 科技 思想理论
天安门母亲 西藏 酷刑 典型案例 联合国 美中
维吾尔族人 弱势群体 妇女 青年 青年视野