Skip to content Skip to navigation

U.N. Commission’s silence on China’s rights record “irresponsible,” says HRIC


The U.N. Commission on Human Rights today shied away from condemning the deteriorating human rights situation in China. The Commission ignored reports, both from its own human rights mechanisms and from independent NGOs, that the Chinese government routinely violates its citizens’ most fundamental rights. HRIC considers the Commission’s decision to refuse even to discuss such serious, systematic rights abuses to be unjustifiable and irresponsible.

“It was the brutal crackdown on the 1989 Democracy Movement that led the Commission to start scrutinizing China’s human rights record. Ten years later, China is experiencing a period of severe repression. Yet the Commission is silent. The world’s highest human rights body has failed to uphold its mandate,” said Xiao Qiang, HRIC’s Executive Director.

The “motion of no action” introduced by China was approved with a majority of 22 votes, with 17 against and 14 abstentions. Tantamount to exercising veto power, this motion is a procedural device that effectively prevented the Commission from discussing on the resolution on China’s human rights situation tabled by the United States. Commission member states were thus prevented from discussing the substance of the resolution and from voting on it. Examining the situation of human rights in all countries in the world is a mandated part of the Commission’s agenda.

Since China has not ratified the two major U.N. human rights treaties—the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights—routine procedures for exercising international scrutiny over the broad range of human rights issues in the PRC are unavailable. Furthermore, the government does not permit the establishment of domestic rights monitoring organizations, and hardly allows any discussion of rights abuses in the media. Thus such international measures as Commission resolutions are crucial in pushing for rights-related changes.

“Eventually, China will have no alternative but to institutionalize protection of human rights. In order to establish human rights norms as the guiding principles of this transition towards a system more in accord with international standards, it is critical to hold China accountable now for its human rights abuses. This is both a moral imperative and a practical necessity. HRIC wishes to thank all the countries who opposed the no action motion. History will judge who voted on the right side,” Xiao Qiang added.


709事件 公眾知​​情權 司法公正 行政拘留 法律天地 任意羈押
公示財產 雙邊對話 黑監獄 書評 商業與人權 審查
零八憲章 兒童 中國法 翻牆技術 公民行動 公民記者
公民參與 民間社會 評論 中國共產黨 憲法 消費者安全
思想爭鳴 腐敗 反恐 向強權說“不!” 文革 文化之角
時政述評 網絡安全 社會民生 民主和政治改革 拆遷 異議人士
教育 選舉 被迫失踪 環境 少數民族 歐盟-中國
計劃生育 農民 結社自由 言論自由 新聞自由 信仰自由
政府問責 政策法規 施政透明 香港 軟禁 中國人權翻譯
戶口 人權理事會 人權動態 非法搜查和拘留 煽動顛覆國家政權 信息控制
信息技術 信息、通信、技術 公民權利和政治權利國際公約 國際人權 國際窗口 國際關係
互聯網 互聯網治理 建三江律師維權 司法改革 六四 綁架
勞改場 勞工權利 土地、財產、房屋 律師權責 律師 法律制度
國內來信 重大事件(環境污染、食品安全、事故等) 毛澤東 微博 全國人大 新公民運動
非政府組織 奧運 一國兩制 網上行動 政府信息公開 人物
警察暴行 司法評述 政治犯 政治 良心犯 歷史鉤沉
宣傳 抗議和請願 公開呼籲 公共安全 種族歧視 勞動教養
維權人士 維權 法治 上海合作組織 特別專題 國家賠償
國家秘密 國家安全 顛覆國家政權 監控 科技 思想理論
天安門母親 西藏 酷刑 典型案例 聯合國 美中
維吾爾族人 弱勢群體 婦女 青年 青年視野