Skip to content Skip to navigation

Law Research Center Is Shut Down as Authorities Tighten Control on Civil Society Groups

July 17, 2009

[Chinese / 中文]

Human Rights in China (HRIC) is deeply concerned about the July 17 shutdown of the Gongmeng Law Research Center of the Open Constitution Initiative (OCI), an organization set up to provide legal consultation and assistance to the public. The Beijing Municipal Bureau of Civil Affairs, which carried out the action, said that the research center was shut down because it did not register with the government.

"In the wake of the violence in Xinjiang, the shutdown of the Gongmeng Law Research Center sends a strong signal that the government will continue to tighten control over civil society in every respect - to sweep up, so to speak - in preparation for the 60th anniversary of the founding of the People's Republic of China in October," said Sharon Hom, executive director of HRIC. "This incident is another example of the government's hostility to independent civil society organizations and rights defense activities."

Founded by three legal scholars and a lawyer in 2003, OCI's work aims to promote the rule of law and social justice. Like many civil society organizations in China, OCI faced onerous and restrictive requirements under the civil society organization regulations and registered in 2005 as a for-profit company instead. In recent months, OCI has been advising family members of victims of the tainted milk powder scandal to file suits against those responsible.

On July 14, OCI received notices from the national and Beijing local taxation bureaus ordering it to pay 1.42 million yuan ($208,000) in fines for tax violations, an amount that is five times the taxes that the authorities said OCI evaded. On July 17, in an operation that lasted from 9:30am to 2:00pm, representatives from the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Civil Affairs came to OCI's office and took away computers and other office machines, as well as files and documents. They also delivered an official decision to shut down the law research center, saying that it is not allowed to operate because it did not register as a civil society organization.

Zhang Lihui (张立辉), a board member and researcher at OCI, said the shutdown lacked legal basis because the research center was part of the OCI organization, and did not have to register separately. He said that OCI - the umbrella organization - intends to "continue to operate according to law. "

Zhang said, "Organizations like OCI help to relieve social conflict. In a society where violence is pervasive, if organizations like OCI are not allowed to exist, violence in society would only increase."


The following is an English translation by HRIC of the Beijing Bureau of Civil Affairs decision.

Bureau of Civil Affairs of Beijing Municipality

Decision on Shutting Down

Beijing Bureau of Civil Affairs Enforcement Shutting Down Document [2009] No. 1

Decision on Shutting Down the Gongmeng Law Research Center of the Open Constitution Initiative

According to an investigation, the Gongmeng Law Research Center of the Open Constitution Initiative has carried out its activities in the name of a private non-enterprise unit without registration and authorization, thereby violating Article 3 of the Provisional Regulation of Registration and Management on Private Non-Enterprise Units. This Bureau has therefore decided, in accordance with Article 27 of the Provisional Regulation on the Registration and Management on Private Non-Enterprise Units and Articles 2 and 3 of the Provisional Measure for Closing Illegal Civil Society Organizations, to shut down the Gongmeng Law Research Center of the Open Constitution Initiative.

This decision is effective upon announcement.

Bureau of Civil Affairs of Beijing Municipality (seal)
July 17, 2009


For more information on crackdowns on civil society, see:

Explore Topics

709 Crackdown Access to Information Access to Justice Administrative Detention All about law Arbitrary Detention
Asset Transparency Bilateral Dialogue Black Jail Book Review Business And Human Rights Censorship
Charter 08 Children Chinese Law Circumvention technology Citizen Activism Citizen Journalists
Citizen Participation Civil Society Commentary Communist Party Of China Constitution Consumer Safety
Contending views Corruption Counterterrorism Courageous Voices Cultural Revolution Culture Matters
Current affairs Cyber Security Daily Challenges Democratic And Political Reform Demolition And Relocation  Dissidents
Education Elections Enforced Disappearance Environment Ethnic Minorities EU-China
Family Planning Farmers Freedom of Association Freedom of Expression Freedom of Press Freedom of Religion
Government Accountability Government regulation Government transparency Hong Kong House Arrest HRIC Translation
Hukou Human Rights Council Human rights developments Illegal Search And Detention Inciting Subversion Of State Power Information Control 
Information technology Information, Communications, Technology (ICT) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) International Human Rights International perspective International Relations
Internet Internet Governance JIansanjiang lawyers' rights defense Judicial Reform June Fourth Kidnapping
Labor Camps Labor Rights Land, Property, Housing Lawyer's rights Lawyers Legal System
Letters from the Mainland Major Event (Environment, Food Safety, Accident, etc.) Mao Zedong Microblogs (Weibo) National People's Congress (NPC) New Citizens Movement
Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Olympics One country, two systems Online Activism Open Government Information Personal stories
Police Brutality Political commentary Political Prisoner Politics Prisoner Of Conscience Probing history
Propaganda Protests And Petitions Public Appeal Public Security Racial Discrimination Reeducation-Through-Labor
Rights Defenders Rights Defense Rule Of Law Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Special Topic State compensation
State Secrets State Security Subversion Of State Power Surveillance Technology Thoughts/Theories
Tiananmen Mothers Tibet Torture Typical cases United Nations US-China 
Uyghurs, Uighurs Vulnerable Groups Women Youth Youth Perspective