Skip to content Skip to navigation

China Escalates Persecution before 25th Anniversary of June Fourth

May 8, 2014

Human Rights in China has learned that Chinese authorities are preventing Ding Zilin (丁子霖), a key member of the Tiananmen Mothers, and her husband from returning to Beijing until after June 4, the 25th anniversary of the violent government crackdown on the 1989 Democracy Movement.

According to sources, state security personnel told the Beijing-based Ding Zilin and her husband, Jiang Peikun (培坤), who had spent the past several weeks in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, that they would not be allowed to travel back to Beijing on May 7, as they had originally planned, but may do so on June 5.

On the night of June 3, 1989, Ding and Jiang’s son, Jiang Jielian (蒋捷连), then 17 and a high school student, was shot in the back and killed by government troops. In previous years around June 4, the couple held private memorial services either at their home or at Muxidi, where their son was killed. This will be the first year that they are not allowed to be in Beijing.

Ding and Jiang’s soft detention occurred just one day after the criminal detention of five individuals in Beijing: lawyer Pu Zhiqiang (浦志強), who is charged with “picking quarrels and provoking troubles” (寻衅滋事); Hu Shigen (胡石根), former political prisoner and lecturer at Beijing Language and Culture University; Xu Youyu (徐友渔), researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences; Liu Di (刘荻), writer; and Hao Jian (郝建), professor at Beijing Film Academy. All were among the attendees of a “2014 June Fourth Seminar” on May 3. In addition, Gao Yu (高瑜), a prominent journalist whose disappearance since April 24 was widely believed to be connected to the upcoming anniversary of June Fourth, has been criminally detained on suspicion of leaking state secrets.

For decades, the Tiananmen Mothers, a group of survivors and family members of victims of June Fourth, have pressed for official accountability for the military actions against unarmed civilians as well as compensation to survivors and victims’ families.

Chinese authorities have never revealed the facts of the military action 25 years ago, or even made public the number and names of those killed. Instead, the nation has been subjected to an enforced amnesia on the incident.

“The relentless efforts by the Chinese authorities to silence discussion of June Fourth and even prevent people from remembering their loved ones only underscore the significance of the demands for accountability and justice,” said Sharon Hom, Executive Director of Human Rights in China.

“Twenty-five years of official impunity is enough—it is high time for the Chinese authorities themselves to face the truth, assume responsibility for their actions, and begin the healing process for the nation. A continued failure to respond to the legitimate demands of its citizens will only strengthen the growing citizen resistance to ongoing and widespread rights violations and abuses.”

Explore Topics

709 Crackdown Access to Information Access to Justice Administrative Detention All about law Arbitrary Detention
Asset Transparency Bilateral Dialogue Black Jail Book Review Business And Human Rights Censorship
Charter 08 Children Chinese Law Circumvention technology Citizen Activism Citizen Journalists
Citizen Participation Civil Society Commentary Communist Party Of China Constitution Consumer Safety
Contending views Corruption Counterterrorism Courageous Voices Cultural Revolution Culture Matters
Current affairs Cyber Security Daily Challenges Democratic And Political Reform Demolition And Relocation  Dissidents
Education Elections Enforced Disappearance Environment Ethnic Minorities EU-China
Family Planning Farmers Freedom of Association Freedom of Expression Freedom of Press Freedom of Religion
Government Accountability Government regulation Government transparency Hong Kong House Arrest HRIC Translation
Hukou Human Rights Council Human rights developments Illegal Search And Detention Inciting Subversion Of State Power Information Control 
Information technology Information, Communications, Technology (ICT) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) International Human Rights International perspective International Relations
Internet Internet Governance JIansanjiang lawyers' rights defense Judicial Reform June Fourth Kidnapping
Labor Camps Labor Rights Land, Property, Housing Lawyer's rights Lawyers Legal System
Letters from the Mainland Major Event (Environment, Food Safety, Accident, etc.) Mao Zedong Microblogs (Weibo) National People's Congress (NPC) New Citizens Movement
Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Olympics One country, two systems Online Activism Open Government Information Personal stories
Police Brutality Political commentary Political Prisoner Politics Prisoner Of Conscience Probing history
Propaganda Protests And Petitions Public Appeal Public Security Racial Discrimination Reeducation-Through-Labor
Rights Defenders Rights Defense Rule Of Law Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Special Topic State compensation
State Secrets State Security Subversion Of State Power Surveillance Technology Thoughts/Theories
Tiananmen Mothers Tibet Torture Typical cases United Nations US-China 
Uyghurs, Uighurs Vulnerable Groups Women Youth Youth Perspective