Skip to content Skip to navigation

Tiananmen Mothers Quote Le Keqiang, Urge Leaders to Take Historical Responsibility for June Fourth

June 1, 2015

At the request of the Tiananmen Mothers, Human Rights in China (HRIC) is issuing the following essay by the group to commemorate the victims of June Fourth on its 26th anniversary. Quoting Premier Li Keqiang’s March 2015 speech that Japan’s leaders today bear historical responsibility for Japan’s war of aggression in China in the 1930s: “the leaders of a state not only inherit their predecessors’ successes, but should also bear historical responsibility for their predecessors’ crimes,” the group asks: “By the same logic, shouldn’t today’s Chinese leaders bear responsibility for the series of crimesmanmade famine and slaughterperpetrated in their own country by China’s leaders at the time: Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping?”

Chinese Leaders Cannot Escape Their Historical Responsibility for the June Fourth Massacre—

Commemorating the 26th Anniversary of the June Fourth Tragedy

Tiananmen Mothers

June 1, 2015

[Translation by Human Rights in China]

A quarter century has passed since the June Fourth Massacre that took place in Beijing, China’s capital, near the end of the last century. But the truth of this tragedy has to this day not been laid bare to the world, and the massacre victims, who have still not received justice, cannot rest in peace. This is a disgrace for the whole Chinese people, and a disgrace for all of civilized humanity!

For two long decades since year 1995, we, as victims and families of victims of the June Fourth tragedy, have been faithfully writing letters to the Two Congresses and the Chinese leaders—stating that the 1989 Tiananmen bloodshed was not a misdeed by the government, but a crime it committed against its people. We ask for a public and just resolution to the June Fourth issue and seek discussion and dialogue with the government concerning the remaining June Fourth issues. Our three demands are: reinvestigate June Fourth and make public the names and number of the deceased; provide an explanation and compensation to the family of each of the victims in accordance with the law; and prosecute those criminally responsible for the June Fourth tragedy. In summary, we seek truth, compensation, and accountability.

However, our appeals have met with no reply.

In the last century, many innocent people’s lives were lost—80 million (some say 60 million) under the rule of the Communist Party of China alone. During the Land Reform and Suppress the Counterrevolutionaries campaigns in the 1950s, many people were beaten to death or murdered; the Great Leap Forward from the late 1950s to the early 1960s (which was in fact the Great Famine) starved numerous people to death; from the 1960s to the 1970s, the nationwide and decade-long turmoil of the Cultural Revolution resulted in the suicide and murder of many people. And near the end of the century, the bloodshed of June 4, 1989 occurred, when the fully-armed field army entered Beijing to carry out the most gruesome massacre of students and other residents, spraying them with machine guns, and crushing their own compatriots with tanks. Exactly how many people died? The number has been tightly concealed to this day.

After the June Fourth bloodshed, we stood up from where our loved ones fell—one by one, we gathered group by group, and gradually we organized ourselves as the Tiananmen Mothers group. In the endless night of darkness, we struggled, lost, struggled, and lost again. Yet we have never stopped, never rested. We did not despair or become discouraged at each failure, did not retreat or disperse. Instead, we continued forward, attracting more and more of those who share the same fate to come to our group.

Two thousand fourteen marked the critical 25th anniversary of June Fourth, when the Tiananmen Mothers as a whole suffered a new level of strict surveillance and suppression. Originally, we had planned that beginning with the 10th anniversary of June Fourth, victims' families in Beijing would hold a collective memorial ceremony every five years. We would bring our deceased family members’ photos, gather in one of our homes, offer flowers, burn incense and light candles, play solemn music, and sprinkle wine to mourn our loved ones, so as to express our sorrows and comfort our loved ones’ souls.

In 1999, the 10th anniversary of June Fourth, we carried out our memorial ceremony under the tight surveillance of plainclothes police.

In 2004, the 15th anniversary, despite the wrongful treatment during the “T-shirt Incident”[1] in March, we still carried out our memorial ceremony under the watch of plainclothes police.

In 2009, the 20th anniversary, apart from Ding Zilin and her husband, who were under house arrest and could not participate, other victims’ families all held the memorial ceremony despite interference.

In 2014, the 25th anniversary of June Fourth, we had originally decided to hold the memorial ceremony in one of our homes on May 16. However, from Tomb-sweeping Day in April to around June 10, the majority of the Tiananmen Mothers in Beijing were visited by officials from the Municipal Public Security Bureau, State Security Brigade, district police sub-stations, and neighborhood committees to “have a talk.” Watch stations were set up outside their homes. And they were followed and watched when they went out. Therefore, the scheduled ceremony had to be abandoned. Even our annual statement on June Fourth could not be issued. In worse cases, some of our members’ homes were searched: Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau officials came to these members’ homes to have “talks” with them that lasted entire days, from morning until night, which ended only when they “voluntarily” surrendered all the documents stored on their personal computers. Ding Zilin and her husband were put under house arrest outside of Beijing from May 4 to June 5. They were, for the first time, not able to keep vigil with their son’s spirit (his ashes are kept in their Beijing home) on his birthday (June 2) and death anniversary (June 3), let alone hold a memorial ceremony at home.

Monitoring of the Tiananmen Mothers did not stop with the passing of the 25th anniversary of June Fourth. Instead, it has become an all-encompassing “new normal.” Previously, the authorities mainly tapped the landlines and mobile phones of some of our core members to keep track of our activities before taking actions. Since early this year, they went so far as installing a bugging device inside the homes of certain members of the Tiananmen Mothers. When members had discussions of matters we were all concerned about, they recorded our conversations—including the drafts of the documents we read out loud—and then intimidated them. The families of victims, filled with righteous anger, denounce such despicable practices

They killed our family members without any explanation; when we demand justice—there is none. There is only persecution and monitoring to shut our mouths, and this is getting worse and worse.

In March 2015, Premier Li Keqiang said at the Two Congresses’ press conference, “the leaders of a state not only inherit their predecessors’ successes, but should also bear historical responsibility for their predecessors’ crimes.”  He was referring to the Japanese military imperialists’ war of aggression against China, and saying that today’s leaders of the Japanese government should bear historical responsibility for the catastrophe their predecessors created in China. By the same logic, shouldn’t today’s Chinese leaders bear responsibility for the series of crimes—manmade famine and slaughter—perpetrated in their own country by China’s leaders at the time: Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping? This is a certainty without a doubt and not easily changed. This is what “upholding a correct view of history, using history as a mirror [to look to the future]” means. The people will wait and see.

 [The leaders] cannot impose a forced amnesia: remember whatever is beneficial to them and forget whatever is damaging to them. From June Fourth to now, each leadership [regime] in China has adopted selective forgetting about June Fourth. We have to unequivocally tell our leaders today that, relying on coerced selective forgetting can only succeed temporarily, and people’s silence cannot sustain over the long term. Debts must always be paid, and can neither be evaded nor reneged on.

The Chinese government’s concealment and deception about June Fourth since 1989 has rendered the whole society an empty shell, where every corner of society is shrouded in pervasive gloom, apathy, despair, and depravity, without fairness, justice, integrity, shame, reverence, remorse, tolerance, responsibility, compassion, or love. Post-June Fourth youth, in particular, cannot find anything about June Fourth in books, magazines, or online media. They cannot find anything about June Fourth victims, their families, or the Tiananmen Mothers. Even the entire history of June Fourth has become a blank for them. Whose fault is this?

Don’t forget what year this is—why people commemorate the 70th anniversary of the world’s victory against fascism, why we commemorate the 70th anniversary of China’s victory in the War of Resistance against Japan, why Taiwan commemorates the “228 ” suppression [of Taiwanese intellectuals], and why Korea commemorates the Gwangju Massacre each year. We ask: when, which day, which year will China also commemorate the tragic deaths of those innocents in the Land Reform and Suppress the Counterrevolutionaries campaigns, the ordinary people who starved to death during the Great Famine, the Chinese citizens tortured and persecuted to death during the ten years of the Cultural Revolution, and the victims of the June Fourth Massacre? People are all united in this belief and abide by this logic!


尤维洁 You Weijie

郭丽英 Guo Liying

张彦秋 Zhang Yanqiu

吴丽虹 Wu Lihong

尹  敏 Yin Min

郝义传 Hao Yichuan

祝枝弟 Zhu Zhidi

叶向荣 Ye Xiangrong

徐  珏 Xu Jue

丁子霖 Ding Zilin

蒋培坤 Jiang Peikun

张先玲 Zhang Xianling

王范地 Wang Fandi

周淑庄 Zhou Shuzhuang

李雪文 Li Xuewen

钱普泰 Qian Putai

吴定富 Wu Dingfu

宋秀玲 Song Xiuling

孙承康 Sun Chengkang

于  清 Yu Qing

孙  宁 Sun Ning

黄金平 Huang Jinping

孟淑英 Meng Shuying

袁淑敏 Yuan Shumin

王广明 Wang Guangming

刘梅花 Liu Meihua

谢京花 Xie Jinghua

马雪琴 Ma Xueqin

邝瑞荣 Kuang Ruirong

张树森 Zhang Shusen

杨大榕 Yang Darong

贺田凤 He Tianfeng

刘秀臣 Liu Xiuchen

沈桂芳 Shen Guifang

谢京荣 Xie Jingrong

金贞玉 Jin Zhenyu

要福荣 Yao Furong

孟淑珍 Meng Shuzhen

田淑玲 Tian Shuling

邵秋风 Shao Qiufeng

王桂荣 Wang Guirong

谭汉凤 Tan Hanfeng

孙恒尧 Sun Hengyao

王文华 Wang Wenhua

陈  梅 Chen Mei

周  燕 Zhou Yan

李桂英 Li Guiying

徐宝艳 Xu Baoyan

狄孟奇 Di Mengqi

王  连 Wang Lian

管卫东 Guan Weidong

高  婕 Gao Jie

刘淑琴 Liu Shuqin

王双兰 Wang Shuanglan

孙珊萍 Sun Shanping

张振霞 Zhang Zhenxia

刘天媛 Liu Tianyuan

黄定英 Huang Dingying

熊  辉 Xiong Hui

张彩凤 Zhang Caifeng

何瑞田 He Ruitian

任金宝 Ren Jinbao

田维炎 Tian Weiyan

杨志玉 Yang Zhiyu

李显远 Li Xianyuan

王玉芹 Wang Yuqin

韩淑香 Han Shuxiang

曹长先 Cao Changxian

方  政 Fang Zheng

齐志勇 Qi Zhiyong

冯友祥 Feng Youxiang

何兴才 He Xingcai

刘仁安 Liu Renan

齐国香 Qi Guoxiang

韩国刚 Han Guogang

石  峰 Shi Feng

庞梅清 Pang Meiqing

黄  宁 Huang Ning

王伯冬 Wang Bodong

张志强 Zhang Zhiqiang

赵金锁 Zhao Jinsuo

孔维真 Kong Weizhen

刘保东 Liu Baodong

陆玉宝 Lu Yubao

齐志英 Qi Zhiying

方桂珍 Fang Guizhen

雷  勇 Lei Yong

肖书兰 Xiao Shulan

葛桂荣 Ge Guirong

郑秀村 Zheng Xiucun

王惠蓉 Wang Huirong

邢承礼 Xing Chengli

桂德兰 Gui Delan

王运启 Wang Yunqi

黄雪芬 Huang Xuefen

郭达显 Guo Daxian

王  琳 Wang Lin

刘  乾 Liu Qian

朱镜蓉 Zhu Jingrong

金亚喜 Jin Yaxi

周国林 Zhou Guolin

穆怀兰 Mu Huailan

王争强 Wang Zhengqiang

宁书平 Ning Shuping

曹云兰 Cao Yunlan

隋立松 Sui Lisong

林武云 Lin Wuyun

冯淑兰 Feng Shulan

付媛媛 Fu Yuanyuan

孙淑芳 Sun Shufang

李春山 Li Chunshan

蒋艳琴 Jiang Yanqin

何凤亭 He Fengting

谭淑琴 Tan Shuqin

奚永顺 Xi Yongshun

肖宗友 Xiao Zongyou

乔秀兰 Qiao Xiulan

陆燕京 Lu yanjing

李浩泉 Li Haoquan

赖运迪   Lai Yundi

周小姣 Zhou Xiaojiao

周运姣 Zhou Yunjiao

陈永朝 Chen Yongchao

陈永邦 Chen Yongbang

刘永亮 LiuYongliang

张景利 Zhang Jingli

孙海文 Sun Haiwen

王海林 Wang Hailin

陆三宝 Lu Sanbao

As suggested by members of victims’ families, the names of our deceased group members who have been signatories over the years are also listed below to honor their unfulfilled wish:

吴学汉 Wu Xuehan

苏冰娴 Su Bingxian

姚瑞生 Yao Ruisheng

杨世钰 Yang Shiyu

袁长录 Yuan Changlu

周淑珍 Zhou Shuzhen

王国先 Wang Guoxian

包玉田 Bao Yutian

林景培 Lin Jingpei

寇玉生 Kou Yusheng

孟金秀 Meng Jinxiu

张俊生 Zhang Junsheng

吴守琴 Wu Shouqin

周治刚 Zhou Zhigang

孙秀芝 Sun Xiuzhi

罗  让 Luo Rang

严光汉 Yan Guanghan

李贞英 Li Zhenying

邝涤清 Kuang Diqing

段宏炳 Duan Hongbing

刘春林 Liu Chunlin

张耀祖 Zhang Yaozu

李淑娟 Li Shujuan

杨银山 Yang Yinshan

王培靖 Wang Peijing

袁可志 Yuan Kezhi

潘木治 Pan Muzhi

萧昌宜 Xiao Changyi

轧伟林 Ya Weilin

刘建兰 Liu Jianlan

索秀女 Suo Xiunü

杨子明 Yang Ziming

程淑珍 Cheng Shuzhen

杜东旭 Du Dongxu

张桂荣 Zhang Guirong

赵廷杰 Zhao Tingjie

陆马生 Lu Masheng



Written by Ding Zilin and Jiang Peikun

based on discussion among members of Tiananmen Mothers


[1] In March 2004, Ding Zilin and two other members of the Tiananmen Mothers were detained and held for several days for attempting to bring into China T-shirts printed with the logo of “1989-2004: Tiananmen Mothers.”

Explore Topics

Access to Information Access to Justice Administrative Detention Arbitrary Detention Asset Transparency Bilateral Dialogue
Black Jail Book Review Business And Human Rights Censorship Children Chinese Law
Citizen Activism Citizen Journalists Citizen Participation Civil Society Communist Party Of China Consumer Safety
Corruption Counterterrorism Cultural Revolution Culture Matters Current and Political Events Cyber Security
Daily Challenges Democratic And Political Reform Demolition And Relocation  Dissidents Economic Reform Education
Enforced Disappearance Environment Ethnic Minorities EU-China Family Planning Farmers
Freedom of Association Freedom of Expression Freedom of Press Freedom of Religion Government Accountability Government regulation
Government transparency Great Leap Forward Heilongjiang Lawyers’ Detention Historical Anecdotes History/Experience Hong Kong
House Arrest House Church Hukou Human Rights Council Human rights updates Ideological Contest
Illegal Search And Detention Inciting Subversion Of State Power Information Control  Information monitoring Information technology Information, Communications, Technology (ICT)
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) International Human Rights International Investment  International Relations International Trade International Window
Internet Internet Governance Judicial Reform June Fourth Kidnapping Labor Camps
Labor Rights Land, Property, Housing Lawyer's rights Lawyers Legal System Legal World
Letters from the Mainland Major Event (Environment, Food Safety, Accident, etc.) Mao Zedong Microblogs (Weibo) National People's Congress (NPC) New Citizens Movement
Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Olympics Online Activism Open Government Information Personal Story Persons With Disabilities
Police Brutality Political commentary Political Prisoner Politics Prisoner Of Conscience Propaganda
Protests And Petitions Public Appeal Racial Discrimination Reeducation-Through-Labor Rights Defenders Rights Defense
Rule Of Law Southern Street Movement Southern Weekly Special Topic State compensation State Secrets
State Security Subversion Of State Power Surveillance Taiwan Technology Thoughts/Theories
Tiananmen Mothers Tibet Torture Typical cases United Nations Uyghurs, Uighurs
Vulnerable Groups Women Xinjiang Youth Youth Perspective