Skip to content Skip to navigation

Guo Feixiong’s Lawyers Will Not Attend Trial if Court Denies Access to Case Materials

September 11, 2014

In a statement issued the day before Guo Feixiong’s trial, Guo’s lawyers, Chen Guangwu and Zhang Xuezhong, citing serious procedural violations by the court, request postponement of the trial and that the court allow them to make photo copies of all the case materials so that they can review them before the trial. The lawyers state that if they are not allowed to photocopy core evidence, they will not attend the trial on September 12, 2014.

The lawyers lists five areas of procedural violations by the court.

  1. The court’s denial of the defense lawyers’ right to review case materials, which include core evidence in the case against Guo Feixiong, is a violation of Article 38 of the Criminal Procedure Law and makes it impossible for the lawyers to mount an effective defense.
  2. The indictment was issued against Guo Feixiong and four other individuals, who should be tried, in accordance with a Supreme People’s Court’s interpretation of the Criminal Procedure Law. More importantly, in cases of “gathering a crowd to disrupt order in a public place,” only the “participants of chief importance” are criminally liable. Therefore, if the defendants in the same case are tried separately, it would be difficult to determine who the participants of chief importance are.
  3. The court’s requirement that defense lawyers use only court computers has no legal basis.
  4. Without informing the defendant of his right to request jurors to be part of the collegial, the court appointed one judge and two deputy judges to form the collegial court. This violates regulations issued by the NPC Standing Committee and the Supreme People’s Court.
  5. The court did not notify the defense lawyers of the trial date three days before the trial.

Explore Topics

Access to Information Access to Justice Administrative Detention Arbitrary Detention Asset Transparency Bilateral Dialogue
Black Jail Book Review Business And Human Rights Censorship Children Chinese Law
Circumvention technology Citizen Activism Citizen Journalists Citizen Participation Civil Society Communist Party Of China
Consumer Safety Corruption Counterterrorism Courageous Voices Cultural Revolution Culture Matters
Current and Political Events Cyber Security Daily Challenges Democratic And Political Reform Demolition And Relocation  Dissidents
Education Enforced Disappearance Environment Ethnic Minorities EU-China Family Planning
Farmers Freedom of Association Freedom of Expression Freedom of Press Freedom of Religion Government Accountability
Government regulation Government transparency Heilongjiang Lawyers’ Detention Historical Anecdotes Hong Kong House Arrest
Hukou Human Rights Council Human rights updates Ideological Contest Illegal Search And Detention Inciting Subversion Of State Power
Information Control  Information technology Information, Communications, Technology (ICT) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) International Human Rights International Relations
International Window Internet Internet Governance Judicial Reform June Fourth Kidnapping
Labor Camps Labor Rights Land, Property, Housing Lawyer's rights Lawyers Legal System
Legal World Letters from the Mainland Major Event (Environment, Food Safety, Accident, etc.) Mao Zedong Microblogs (Weibo) National People's Congress (NPC)
New Citizens Movement Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Olympics Online Activism Open Government Information Personal Story
Police Brutality Political commentary Political Prisoner Politics Prisoner Of Conscience Propaganda
Protests And Petitions Public Appeal Public Security Racial Discrimination Reeducation-Through-Labor Rights Defenders
Rights Defense Rule Of Law Special Topic State compensation State Secrets State Security
Subversion Of State Power Surveillance Technology Thoughts/Theories Tiananmen Mothers Tibet
Torture Typical cases United Nations Uyghurs, Uighurs Vulnerable Groups Women
Youth Youth Perspective