Skip to content Skip to navigation

My husband Li Heping, Part 6—Account of my first criminal summons

August 6, 2015

In the course of my search for my husband and Chunfu [Li Heping’s younger brother] being taken away, I’ve come to a spot I’ve never imagined before. After calls from the Beijing Public Security Bureau for two consecutive days asking me to have a talk about my writings online, and I refused to comply, an extremely disturbing drama took place today.

First of all, I am really scared. After Heping was taken away and dropped out of reach, I don’t believe what the police say. Therefore, when they came knocking at the door today saying they came with proper legal procedures, I couldn’t believe them. There is no gap under my door, so they couldn’t slip the documents through. I told the people outside my door that I would lower a basket from my balcony to bring the papers up and that once I signed, I’d go with them. But they refused. A standstill lasted for two hours. Not knowing what to do, I kept calling 110, for complaint, for the police, and I called the government’s public line. At 2 o’clock in the afternoon, what they had been calling an administrative summons in the morning became a criminal summons. I don’t know where the police found this person, who opened the lock on my door and came in. I finally saw their criminal summons, signed by the Hexi Branch of the Tianjin Public Security Bureau. The person who showed me his ID was a young guy from the Tianjin Public Security Bureau. Afterwards, a policewoman from the area also showed her ID. Only the policeman in charge refused to show his. He only said he was from the Beijing Public Security Bureau, assisting Tianjin police’s work.

We went to Boxing Road police substation and into the interrogation room. Later, I was called out of the room so that they could take my fingerprints, my height, and my picture. The young guy who was doing all this asked what category my information should go under. The policeman in charge said: “Other.”

After the data collection, interrogation started at 2:30 p.m., regarding a piece on Boxun about searching for Li Heping. The interrogator asked if I was the one who wrote it. I refused to answer. He asked whether the complaint against Xinhua was written by me. I said I commissioned a lawyer to write it and thanked him for his concern about civil cases. He said he didn’t deal with civil cases but was asking about it because it was posted on Boxun—a website the authorities consider to be a hostile force. It’s a pity I really don’t know where Boxun is.

Anyways, the main point was that if my writings were posted on Boxun again, they would use the same method to summons me. They also asked me to let my lawyer know that I have to be careful about being used by people with ulterior motives if Boxun shares my stuff again. Finally, I insisted on asking the policeman who interrogated me to show his ID. He said there was already someone from Tianjin Public Security Bureau who showed me his ID, so he wouldn’t do that. I said: it’s you who are interrogating me, not the person from Tianjin Public Security Bureau. If I were more experienced, next time I’d only talk to the person who showed me his ID. He just wouldn’t show me his ID. So I refused to sign the interrogation record. In the end, he still didn’t show it to me. At 7:08 p.m., they wanted me to sign the summons. I asked the policeman from Tianjin Public Security Bureau whether I could leave after signing that. He said yes. I left the room after I signed but did not dare leave the police station immediately. I sat on a chair in the lobby more than half of an hour before I left. To be honest, I felt I could trust the one who showed his ID more. The other one who refused to show me his, I just felt he was up to no good and wanted to stay far away from him.

Source (CH): https://plus.google.com/+GuestsZhen/posts/iZ7hKA9932x

Explore Topics

Access to Information Access to Justice Administrative Detention Arbitrary Detention Asset Transparency Bilateral Dialogue
Black Jail Book Review Business And Human Rights Censorship Children Chinese Law
Circumvention technology Citizen Activism Citizen Journalists Citizen Participation Civil Society Communist Party Of China
Consumer Safety Corruption Counterterrorism Courageous Voices Cultural Revolution Culture Matters
Current and Political Events Cyber Security Daily Challenges Democratic And Political Reform Demolition And Relocation  Dissidents
Education Enforced Disappearance Environment Ethnic Minorities EU-China Family Planning
Farmers Freedom of Association Freedom of Expression Freedom of Press Freedom of Religion Government Accountability
Government regulation Government transparency Heilongjiang Lawyers’ Detention Historical Anecdotes Hong Kong House Arrest
Hukou Human Rights Council Human rights updates Ideological Contest Illegal Search And Detention Inciting Subversion Of State Power
Information Control  Information technology Information, Communications, Technology (ICT) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) International Human Rights International Relations
International Window Internet Internet Governance Judicial Reform June Fourth Kidnapping
Labor Camps Labor Rights Land, Property, Housing Lawyer's rights Lawyers Legal System
Legal World Letters from the Mainland Major Event (Environment, Food Safety, Accident, etc.) Mao Zedong Microblogs (Weibo) National People's Congress (NPC)
New Citizens Movement Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Olympics Online Activism Open Government Information Personal Story
Police Brutality Political commentary Political Prisoner Politics Prisoner Of Conscience Propaganda
Protests And Petitions Public Appeal Public Security Racial Discrimination Reeducation-Through-Labor Rights Defenders
Rights Defense Rule Of Law Special Topic State compensation State Secrets State Security
Subversion Of State Power Surveillance Technology Thoughts/Theories Tiananmen Mothers Tibet
Torture Typical cases United Nations Uyghurs, Uighurs Vulnerable Groups Women
Youth Youth Perspective