Skip to content Skip to navigation

China Faces Scrutiny in UN Torture Review

November 17, 2015

In Geneva today, 40 representatives of the Chinese government faced three hours of hard-hitting questions from UN independent experts regarding China’s implementation of the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Today’s session began China’s fifth review before the UN Committee Against Torture on its compliance with treaty obligations.

The nine Committee members delved into almost every area of China’s responsibility under the Convention, including legislative, administrative, judicial, and other measures preventing acts of torture. (Under the rule that experts do not participate in the review of states of which they are nationals, the tenth member of the Committee, a Chinese member, was required to abstain from the process.)

The Committee experts’ questions covered not only the practice of torture and what has been done to effectively prevent it—such as the number of deaths in custody due to violent acts and whether there are statistics showing that laws against torture are enforced—but also the entrenched systemic problems that give rise to miscarriages of justice and torture, including political interference in the judicial process, impunity for the perpetrators of torture, and attacks on lawyers who represent cases deemed sensitive by the authorities. The experts also requested clarifications or more information about the impact of legislation on access to justice, information, or reprisals against citizen participation including the Criminal Law, State Secrets Law, National Security Law, Open Government Information Regulations, and Lawyers’ Law.

Cases raised by the experts included those of Gao Yu, Liu Xia, Cao Shunli, and individual lawyers. The Committee also repeated its requests for information on 24 Tibetans—information that China had failed to provide in its responses to the Committee’s June 2015 List of Issues.

In the second session tomorrow, November 18, the Chinese delegation—representing 21 government departments from mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau, including the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Public Security, Ministry of Justice, State Ethnic Affairs Commission, and Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress—are expected to respond to the Committee’s questions.

“We have raised a million questions and we know that you will have a short time to answer—but this is not an impossible mission,” said Claudio Grossman, chairman of the Committee at the end of the session today.

For this review, China submitted its official report in 2013. The Committee issued a list of 39 further questions—the List of Issues, or LOI—in June this year. When China sent its responses in October, it made them available only in Chinese initially, which HRIC translated into English.

Related Resources
  • Live webcast of the review: ENCH
  • HRIC Bulletin, “China Claims It Has Always Encouraged And Supported Lawyers,” November 13, 2015: EN
  • HRIC parallel submission in advance of the review of the PRC's fifth report (2015): EN
  • China’s fifth periodic report (2013): EN,CH
  • List of issues in relation to the fifth periodic report of China (2015): ENCH
  • China's responses to list of issues (2015): CHBilingual, Bilingual Excerpts
  • HRIC’s webpage on China and the CAT
  • Case highlight

Explore Topics

Access to Information Access to Justice Administrative Detention Arbitrary Detention Asset Transparency Bilateral Dialogue
Black Jail Book Review Business And Human Rights Censorship Children Chinese Law
Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) Citizen Activism Citizen Journalists Citizen Participation Civil Society Communist Party Of China
Consumer Safety Corruption Counterterrorism Cultural Revolution Culture Matters Current and Political Events
Cyber Security Daily Challenges Democratic And Political Reform Demolition And Relocation  Dissidents Economic Reform
Education Enforced Disappearance Environment Ethnic Minorities EU-China Family Planning
Farmers Freedom of Association Freedom of Expression Freedom of Press Freedom of Religion Government Accountability
Government regulation Government transparency Great Leap Forward Heilongjiang Lawyers’ Detention Historical Anecdotes History/Experience
Hong Kong House Arrest House Church Hukou Human Rights Council Human rights updates
Ideological Contest Illegal Search And Detention Inciting Subversion Of State Power Information Control  Information monitoring Information technology
Information, Communications, Technology (ICT) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) International Engagement  International Human Rights International Investment  International Relations
International Trade International Window Internet Internet Governance Judicial Reform June Fourth
Kidnapping Labor Camps Labor Rights Land, Property, Housing Lawyer's rights Lawyers
Legal System Legal World Letters from the Mainland Major Event (Environment, Food Safety, Accident, etc.) Mao Zedong Microblogs (Weibo)
National People's Congress (NPC) New Citizens Movement Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Olympics Online Activism Open Government Information
Personal Story Persons With Disabilities Police Brutality Political commentary Political Prisoner Politics
Prisoner Of Conscience Propaganda Protests And Petitions Public Appeal Racial Discrimination Reeducation-Through-Labor
Rights Defenders Rights Defense Rule Of Law Southern Street Movement Southern Weekly Special Topic
State compensation State Secrets State Security Subversion Of State Power Surveillance Taiwan
Technology Thoughts/Theories Tiananmen Mothers Tibet Torture Typical cases
United Nations Uyghurs, Uighurs Vulnerable Groups Women Xinjiang Youth
Youth Perspective