Skip to content Skip to navigation

International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD)

The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) was adopted in 1965 by the UN General Assembly, and entered into force in 1969. With 175 state parties as of 2014, CERD is one of the most widely ratified human rights treaties. The CERD defines racial discrimination as “any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms,” and sets out state parties’ obligations to combat racial discrimination by, for instance:

  • Eliminating all forms of racial discrimination and promoting understanding among all races;
  • Eradicating racial segregation and the crime of apartheid within their jurisdictions;
  • Eradicating all incitement to racial hatred and discrimination;
  • Guaranteeing the right of everyone, without distinction as to race, colour, or national origin, to equality before law and enjoyment of fundamental rights;
  • Ensuring effective judicial protection and remedies; and
  • Adopting measures to combat prejudices and promote understanding and tolerance among racial or ethnic groups.

In addition, the CERD establishes the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (“the Committee”), a group of 18 independent experts who meet twice a year in Geneva. This is the first UN human rights treaty body. The Committee provides guidance for and also monitors each state party’s compliance with the CERD by drafting general comments on the scope of the treaty obligations, convening thematic discussions regarding racial discrimination, and conducting reviews of state parties’ progress in implementing the treaty. The Committee may also issue decisions under its early warnings and urgent action procedures to prevent and limit serious patterns of racial discriminations, address escalating racial hatred and violence, and accept individual complaints and communications alleging a state party’s violation of rights under the Convention where that state has recognized the competence of the Committee for this purpose. As of mid-2014, China has not yet recognized the Committee’s competence to receive individual communications, and therefore the Committee may not accept individual complaints related to China.

To comply with the review process, each state party must submit a report to the Committee every two years on steps taken to implement the Convention, but, in practice, reports are often combined and reviewed every four or more years. To prepare for a state party’s review, the Committee designates one of its members as the “Country Rapporteur,” who takes the lead in drafting documents for and conducting the state party’s review. One such document is the “list of themes,” which provides a non-exhaustive list of topics that should be raised during the interactive dialogue session of the review. Unlike the list of issues employed by other treaty bodies, the list of themes does not require that the state party provide written responses prior to the dialogue, but rather serves as a guide for the discussion.  After considering all the materials, the Committee conducts a review of the state party in the form of an interactive dialogue with representatives of the state party. Following the review, the Committee adopts concluding observations, which include final remarks and recommendations from the review, and may request that the state party submit a follow-up report or information on select areas.

Through the review process, civil society members can provide input to the Committee at various points by submitting reports, making oral statements, and organizing side events and briefings for Committee members. The Committee also encourages state parties to consult and incorporate information from civil society members in their national reports and follow-up procedures, and requires that the concluding observations are widely disseminated following the review. In addition to information from civil society members, the Committee also considers that from other stakeholders such as national human rights institutes.

China and the CERD

China ratified the CERD in 1981.

When states become parties to international treaties, they are permitted to do so with reservations, understandings, or declarations, which clarify the states’ interpretation of certain provisions, or change the state’s rights and obligations under the treaty. To be valid, any such conditions cannot contradict the purpose of the treaty itself. At the time of ratification, China declared that it would not consider itself bound by article 22, which states:

Any dispute between two or more State Parties with respect to the interpretation or application of this Convention, which is not settled by negotiation or by the procedures expressly provided for in this Convention, shall, at the request of any of the parties to the dispute, be referred to the International Court of Justice for decision, unless the disputants agree to another mode of settlement.

Since its ratification of CERD, China has been reviewed by the Committee six times. Its next review is yet to be scheduled. See side bar for official documents and HRIC contributions related to China’s CERD reviews.

Official Documents & HRIC Contributions

Combined Fourteenth, Fifteenth, Sixteenth, and Seventeenth Review

  • China’s combined fourteenth, fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth periodic reports (2017): CH

Combined Tenth, Eleventh, Twelfth, and Thirteenth Review (2009)

  • China’s combined tenth, eleventh, twelfth, and thirteenth periodic reports (2008): EN, CH
  • List of questions by the country rapporteur in connection with the consideration of the tenth to thirteenth periodic reports of China (2009): EN, CH
  • HRIC parallel submission in advance of the review of the PRC's thirteenth report (2009): EN, CH
  • Summary record of consideration of ten to thirteen periodic reports of China (2009): EN
  • Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (2009): EN, CH
  • China’s follow-up report on the implementation of the concluding observations of the Committee (2010): EN, CH
  • Consideration of the follow-up report by the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (2011): EN

Combined Eighth and Ninth Review (2001)

  • China’s combined eighth and ninth periodic reports (2000): EN, CH
  • HRIC parallel submission in advance of the review of the PRC's eighth and ninth periodic report  (2001): EN; appended recommendations: EN
  • Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (2001): EN, CH
  • Follow-up letter sent to the state party by the Committee (2007): EN

Combined Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Review (1996)

  • China’s combined fifth, sixth, and seventh periodic reports (1996): EN
  • Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (1996): EN, CH 

Combined Third and Fourth Review (1990)

  • China’s third periodic report (1987): EN
  • China’s fourth periodic report (1990): EN
  • Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (1991): EN, CH

Second Review (1986)

  • China’s second periodic report (1985): EN
  • Summary record of consideration of China’s second review (1986): EN
  • Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (1987), paragraphs 329-346: EN

Initial Review (1983)

  • China’s initial report (1983): EN
  • Addendum to China’s initial report (1983): EN
  • Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (1983): EN
Other Resources
  • Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination: EN, CH
  • Full text of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination: EN, CH
  • Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance: EN, CH
  • UN treaty body webcast: EN

Explore Topics

Access to Information Access to Justice Administrative Detention Arbitrary Detention Asset Transparency Bilateral Dialogue
Black Jail Book Review Business And Human Rights Censorship Children Chinese Law
Circumvention technology Citizen Activism Citizen Journalists Citizen Participation Civil Society Communist Party Of China
Consumer Safety Corruption Counterterrorism Courageous Voices Cultural Revolution Culture Matters
Current and Political Events Cyber Security Daily Challenges Democratic And Political Reform Demolition And Relocation  Dissidents
Education Enforced Disappearance Environment Ethnic Minorities EU-China Family Planning
Farmers Freedom of Association Freedom of Expression Freedom of Press Freedom of Religion Government Accountability
Government regulation Government transparency Heilongjiang Lawyers’ Detention Historical Anecdotes Hong Kong House Arrest
HRIC Translation Hukou Human Rights Council Human rights updates Ideological Contest Illegal Search And Detention
Inciting Subversion Of State Power Information Control  Information technology Information, Communications, Technology (ICT) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) International Human Rights
International Relations International Window Internet Internet Governance Judicial Reform June Fourth
Kidnapping Labor Camps Labor Rights Land, Property, Housing Lawyer's rights Lawyers
Legal System Legal World Letters from the Mainland Major Event (Environment, Food Safety, Accident, etc.) Mao Zedong Microblogs (Weibo)
National People's Congress (NPC) New Citizens Movement Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Olympics Online Activism Open Government Information
Personal Story Police Brutality Political commentary Political Prisoner Politics Prisoner Of Conscience
Propaganda Protests And Petitions Public Appeal Public Security Racial Discrimination Reeducation-Through-Labor
Rights Defenders Rights Defense Rule Of Law Special Topic State compensation State Secrets
State Security Subversion Of State Power Surveillance Technology Thoughts/Theories Tiananmen Mothers
Tibet Torture Typical cases United Nations Uyghurs, Uighurs Vulnerable Groups
Women Youth Youth Perspective